The Ballad of MollyB: Cows on the Run

Molly B makes a dash onto 8th Avenue South in Great Falls while running from law enforcement officers on Jan. 5, 2006. Credit: Robin Loznak / Associated Press -  http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2011/02/unsinkable-molly-b-cow.html

Montana cow, later named MollyB, dashes away from slaughter.

Just hours away from becoming USDA and organic certified beef, Montana cow Molly B dashed away.  Chased by animal control officers, she swam across the Missouri river, earning the name “Unsinkable Molly B.”  Del Morris, manager at Mickey’s Packing Plant in Great Falls, MT, estimated that as a a heifer, Molly B was worth around $1,140 — at 95 cents per-pound. Her daring escape inspired local country DJs Scott Hershey and Brent Browning to write the Ballad of Molly B. Listen to it here.

Molly B

Molly B

After MollyB dashed for freedom in 2006, she found safe haven at the Montana Large Animal Sanctuary and Rescue.  But it was not to be the forever kumbaya home we all root for.  In 2011, Molly B was in the headlines again: Unsinkable Molly B, cow who escaped Montana slaughterhouse in 2006, moves to a new home , wrote the LA Times:

Molly B was among an estimated 1,200 animals removed from the Montana Large Animal Sanctuary and Rescue in recent weeks as part of a massive effort to bail out its overwhelmed owners. Animal welfare groups said they were forced to euthanize dozens of starving and ill cattle, horses and llamas found on the 400-acre sanctuary in rural Sanders County. The bovine celebrity herself — an overweight black Angus breed said to be sore in the hoof but otherwise relatively healthy — was removed to a nearby ranch and is headed this week to a smaller farm sanctuary. “Molly B made it OK. She’s a tough old broad,” said Jerry Finch with Habitat for Horses of Hitchcock, Texas, who participated in the rescue effort. “She had bad feet, but she was not anywhere near as bad as some of the others.”

Like in the movies, Molly B had more obstacles to overcome:  the newest rescue efforts almost left her behind. A steer (male!) had been rescued, mistaken for MollyB!

Yet when New Dawn owner Susan Eakins watched one of the reports on the nightly news, video of the cow climbing a hill revealed the sanctuary had gotten the wrong animal — a male steer named “Big Mike.” A mix-up left Molly B behind on another ranch.

Eventually, happy ending for Molly B at New Dawn Montana Farm Animal Sanctuary near Stevensville,MT:

The sanctuary’s Sue Eakins tells the Ravalli Republic it was a relief to have Molly B delivered safely last week. She says she and her husband had been warned about Molly’s demeanor, but Eakins says Molly is a “sweetie pie.”

Molly B at New Dawn, MT

Molly B at New Dawn, MT

Perhaps inspired by Molly B, two plucky New Jersey bovines raced for freedom in 2013:

The two cows were purchased Tuesday by a Montvale resident and were to be taken to Paterson for slaughter on Wednesday, according to Tyco Animal Control officer Carol Tyler. The trailer on the resident’s property couldn’t hold the 250-300 lbs. animals, and by Tuesday night they were causing chaos on Upper Saddle River and Chestnut Ridge roads, according to authorities. Drivers were forced to swerve around them, and roads were closed during the night-time escape.

The New Jersey bovines, a cow and a bull,  were offered retirement at Abma Farms in Wyckoff, NJ, where free-range poultry and pork are sold along with garden veggies, but no beef.

———————————————————

Notes: The Ballad of MollyB, written and performed by Scott Hershey and Brent Browning, DJs on on Max Country 94.5 FM www.greatfallstribune.com/multimedia/mollyb/index.html Cow on the lam, Heifer eludes authorities for six hours Clifton Adcock / Tribune Staff Writer, Feb 8, 2008 www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artikkel?NoCache=1&Dato=20060106&Kategori=NEWS01&Lopenr=80208027&Ref=AR

Advertisements

The Happy Animal: Bambi or Bessie?

“Happy, happy, what’s all this happiness talk,” my mother said. I had not expected such a negative reaction. My mother grew up in a country where happiness, historically, was not an option. It was seldom discussed. Being happy was not a good goal in life. “It’s all about safety,” my mother concluded.

Turns out, my mother’s philosophy echoes not only her upbringing, but historical attitudes. Darrin McMahon, a professor of history at Florida State University and the author of “Happiness, A History,” writes:

    Americans today consider happiness not only something that would be nice to have, but something that we really ought to have […] it is also a relatively recent idea in the West which dates from the 17th and 18th centuries, a time that ushered in a dramatic shift in what human beings could legitimately hope to expect in and from their lives. People prior to the late 17th century thought happiness was a matter of luck or virtue or divine favor. Today we think of happiness as a right and a skill that can be developed.

It’s only recently that I’ve seen happiness addressed in science. The name that comes to mind is Martin E.P. Seligman, Ph.D., who “works on positive psychology, learned helplessness, depression, and on optimism and pessimism.”

Concerns about whether our animals are happy followed. In 2004, new dressage rules added the requirement that dressage judges were to judge if a horse in a dressage show was “happy” as well as judge the other aspects of performance. I believe this rule has been dropped since, due to the inability for a judge to know if a horse is happily performing or not, at least not based on observing the performance itself.

Can we know?
So how do we evaluate animal happiness? Are wild animals happier than wild animals held in captivity? What about domestic animals?

“We have no evidence whatsoever that wild animals are, in any way, happier than domesticated ones which are treated well,” writes Christie Wilcox in her guest blog post for Scientific American, Bambi or Bessie: Are wild animals happier?

As an animal owner (or do they own me?) I am happy to read that science supports the fact that our domestic animals can be content. No surprise, really, we knew that — given the dangers of living in the wild, animals might choose to live in the proximity of humans or life as a domestic.

Wilcox explains her conclusion, based on what can be measured and evaluated by the objective scientific method: since we cannot measure happiness, the closest guide we have is measuring levels of stress hormones:

    Instead, we tend to qualify happiness in animals as a lack of chronic stress. Stress, unlike happiness, is very easy to measure. You can look for decreases in overall health in just about any kind of creature. You can keep an eye out for neurotic behaviors, and measurements of hormone levels of cortisol, norepinephrine, adrenaline and other “stress” hormones provide a quantified means of measuring stress. Though lack of stress doesn’t guarantee “happiness”, it’s the closest we can get.

It’s worth clicking on the link to see the details of the stress measurements.

    In fact, a decreased stress response compared to wild counterparts has been found in every single domesticated species that has been studied.

Wilcox adds:

    Domesticated animals don’t feel stress about the future, because they don’t have an understanding of their future in the same way we do. A cow doesn’t live a more stressed or unhappy life than a dog or a deer because it is destined to be killed for its meat. Cows aren’t upset that they will end up as steaks because, as Michael Pollan phrased it, “in a bovine brain the concept of nonexistence is blissfully absent.”

Wilcox’s excellent post, perhaps for the sake of brevity, omits issues I think are important when discussing the parameters of what might contribute to happiness: does not address the intellgence – happiness correlation, the freedom of choice, the “Watership Down” choices, the golden cage syndrome, or the larger issues of whether we have any right to manipulate genes and environments with little understanding of consequences.

I also disagree with Pollan’s assertion as quoted by Wilcox. We do not have the proper tools to even ask a bovine if they have a concept of non-existence, and by tools I mean training, communication and other non-invasive methods, with the note that high-tech electronics can help decipher animal communications. Or we simply don’t have the funds and the will to spend a lot of effort on such research.

I had to check up Wilcox’s reference to Pollan’s article and here’s another quote worth pondering:

    From the animals’ point of view, the bargain with humanity has been a great success, at least until our own time. Cows, pigs, dogs, cats and chickens have thrived, while their wild ancestors have languished. (There are 10,000 wolves in North America, 50,000,000 dogs.) Nor does their loss of autonomy seem to trouble these creatures.

    It is wrong, the rightists say, to treat animals as “means” rather than “ends,” yet the happiness of a working animal like the dog consists precisely in serving as a “means.” Liberation is the last thing such a creature wants. To say of one of Joel Salatin’s caged chickens that “the life of freedom is to be preferred” betrays an ignorance about chicken preferences–which on this farm are heavily focused on not getting their heads bitten off by weasels.

It’s pretty safe to agree with the fear of weasels part. It’s also a fact that “liberation” is not a solution. We have no wilderness left! There’s no place to liberate anyone, not too mention that liberated animals lack any survival skills. However I have reservations about assuming that the “creatures” are not troubled by loss of autonomy — as with the concept of non-existence, we have limited communication ability, no way to test if animals understand these concepts. Note that humans sometimes trade freedom and autonomy for safety and sustenance and that makes social life possible.

From an environmental point of view, my mother was likely correct. We witness how the pursuit of short-term rewards without much thought to what will happen 500 years from now has endangered Earth’s ecology as we know it. In this light, it is important to discuss and research what makes us happy. And what makes animals content as far as we can tell. Can pursue happiness within the restraints and the limits of Earth’s carrying capacity?

Stay tuned for further discussions about happiness, stress and how can we know.


Notes:

Bambi or Bessie: Are wild animals happier?, By Christie Wilcox | Apr 12, 2011
www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=bambi-or-bessie-are-wild-animals-ha-2011-04-12

Observations of a Nerd, Christie Willcox’ blog:
scienceblogs.com/observations/

Martin E.P. Seligman, Ph.D – bio at UPenn:
“His most recent book is the best-selling, Authentic Happiness (Free Press, 2002)”
www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu/bio.htm

Dressage riders to aim for happy horses, Seamour Rathore, 28 October, 2004
www.horseandhound.co.uk/competitionnews/article.php?aid=59020
selected quotes:

    Dr Eric van Breda, a specialist in comparative human and equine training and exercise physiology moved the debate on by saying that happiness cannot be measured in equine athletes as it is in human athletes.
    “From a scientific point of view we need to find a way of measuring the dressage horse’s ‘happiness’. But this needs a lot more field research [rather than theoretical] and out of competition measurements of ‘happiness’ [to provide a control].”
    [snip]
    David Hunt, president of the International Dressage Trainers Club spoke for a lot of the delegates and echoed Kyra’s concerns about the interpretation of the new rule: “The “happy athlete” is a good perception but it has its disadvantages — it can be misinterpreted very easily.

www.fei.org/sites/default/files/file/DISCIPLINES/DRESSAGE/Rules/RULES_DRESSAGE_2011_BLACK-VERSION_web.pdf

What Makes You Happy? How Our Notions of “Happiness” Can Doom Us to Sadness
When we want to be happy all of the time, we can forget that the pursuit of happiness can entail struggle, sacrifice, even pain.

by Darrin McMahon, April 28, 2011
 /www.alternet.org/culture/150778/what_makes_you_happy_how_our_notions_of_%22happiness%22_can_doom_us_to_sadness

Watership Down, by Richard Adams (1972) was censored and forbidden reading under communism. I listened to Voice of America and Radio Free Europe readings of the book. This does not seem to be mentioned by the Wikipedia entry on 05/22/2011
Why we’re all animal lovers
From Watership Down to Tarka the Otter, what is the appeal of anthropomorphic literature?
www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2008/jun/10/whywereallanimallovers

An Animal’s Place
by Michael Pollan, The New York Times Magazine, Nov 10, 2002
PDF here: quotesonslavery.org/media/pdf/michael-pollan-20021110.pdf